It is only basic, but works in this way for other platforms.
It works because MUAs are able to reconstruct threads originating from mails
they don't know about (unknown Message-ID).
This has some drawbacks:
* MUAs might show the missing start of the thread. As a normal user of a
package never got *all* notifications of a package anyways it only reflects
the reality
* Missing notifications go unnoticed. This is no regression so it should be
fine
Those could be fixed by including all previous comments in 'References:',
which would require to have predictable 'Message-ID:' for notification mails.
This would require more code and more database accesses at runtime.
Could also be used for out of date notifications.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer <archlinux@cryptocrack.de>
Store the last packager in addition to storing the submitter and the
maintainer of a package. This allows for checking who last updated a
package, even if the package has been disowned.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer <archlinux@cryptocrack.de>
All pkgbase_*() functions should operate on package base IDs. Drop the
superfluous (and incorrect) parameter conversion from package IDs to
package base IDs.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer <archlinux@cryptocrack.de>
pkgbase_user_voted() should expect a package base ID, not a package ID.
Change the SQL query accordingly.
This fixes the vote status on package base pages.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer <archlinux@cryptocrack.de>
